[SilenN]

What sections where you most off put by?

I used Claude to expand on my ideas for a few of the purely informational things, and for formatting, but this article is largely written by hand.

For example "Interface tests are the ability to know what's wrong and explaining it." is in hindsight a confusing sentence. Many such cases.

[stavros]

It's things like this "super impactful!!!" style it has:

> Enter Claude Code 2.0.

> The UX had evolved. The harness is more flexible and robust. Bugs are fixed. But that's all secondary.

It's OK for emphasis on some things, but when you see it on every blog, it's a bit much.

Plus, I dislike that everything is lists with LLMs, it's another thing that you just start seeing everywhere.

[SilenN]

That section doesn't include a lick of AI writing. One tell (maybe?) is that I switch from past tense to present tense mid sentence.

Either a) I sound like an LLM when I'm writing articles (possible) or b) turing test AGI something something.

Lists point is fair, I did use Claude for formatting. Where did it off put you here?