top | item 46701194 (no title) tomnipotent | 1 month ago I believe they were just pointing out that Postgres doesn't do in-place updates, so every update (with or without partitions) is a write followed by marking the previous tuple deleted so it can get vacuumed. discuss order hn newest snuxoll|1 month ago That’s not at all what the child to me was saying in even a generous reading.But HOT updates are a thing, too. tomnipotent|1 month ago What do you think they were saying? I don't see any other way to read it.HOT updates write to the same tuple page and can avoid updating indexes, but it's still a write followed by marking the old tuple for deletion. load replies (1)
snuxoll|1 month ago That’s not at all what the child to me was saying in even a generous reading.But HOT updates are a thing, too. tomnipotent|1 month ago What do you think they were saying? I don't see any other way to read it.HOT updates write to the same tuple page and can avoid updating indexes, but it's still a write followed by marking the old tuple for deletion. load replies (1)
tomnipotent|1 month ago What do you think they were saying? I don't see any other way to read it.HOT updates write to the same tuple page and can avoid updating indexes, but it's still a write followed by marking the old tuple for deletion. load replies (1)
snuxoll|1 month ago
But HOT updates are a thing, too.
tomnipotent|1 month ago
HOT updates write to the same tuple page and can avoid updating indexes, but it's still a write followed by marking the old tuple for deletion.