In the second report, Daniel greeted the slopper very kindly and tried to start a conversation with them. But the slopper calls him by the completely wrong name. And this was December 2023. It must have been extremely tiring.
This (manual?) addition in the second report [1] likely gives an idea as to the reporter's mastery of English and ability to proofread before spamming out slop:
> Sorry that I'm replying to other triager of other program, so it's mistake went in flow
I think it would be really interesting if someone at HackerOne did a dive into the demographic of many of the banned posters.
December 2023... that was early AI era. Had to double-check the dates actually, because I misremembered the release date of GPT-4 as being in 2024; turns out it was in 2023, and that was when LLMs first became remotely useful for even this kind of slop.
I looked at two reports, and I can’t tell if the reports are directly from an ai or some very junior student not really understanding security. LLms to me sound generally more convincing.
They're very clearly AI when you're told that it's a list of AI. But when you're given a mixed list of AI and genuine reports, I bet it's not so simple and very time consuming
plastic041|1 month ago
johncoltrane|1 month ago
First new word of 2026. Thank you.
ValentineC|1 month ago
> Sorry that I'm replying to other triager of other program, so it's mistake went in flow
I think it would be really interesting if someone at HackerOne did a dive into the demographic of many of the banned posters.
[1] https://hackerone.com/reports/2298307#activity-25314164
TeMPOraL|1 month ago
golem14|1 month ago
mirekrusin|1 month ago
[0] https://hackerone.com/reports/2298307
shusaku|1 month ago
Seeing Bard mentioned as an LLM takes me back :)
worldsavior|1 month ago
ChrisRR|1 month ago
potatoproduct|1 month ago
ares623|1 month ago
OsrsNeedsf2P|1 month ago