top | item 46704077 (no title) greggsy | 1 month ago Unlike macOS, your cat does not, and will not, meet the industry-accepted standard that describes unix as we know it today.https://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/xym0.htm discuss order hn newest bigyabai|1 month ago Like macOS, my cat does not qualify for the UNIX standard out-of-the-box and I'm far too lazy to configure my cat for an OS standard that's 25 years obsolete. shiomiru|1 month ago > as we know it todayAn important nuance you seem to be missing is that SUSv3 is equivalent to "IEEE Std 1003.1-2001" (that is, POSIX 2001).In practice, I've had to work around more POSIX compatibility issues in macOS than in all other actively developed (Free) Unix-likes, combined. remix2000|1 month ago Mayhaps not with a `cat(1)` alone, but really they just need to expand their menagerie now.
bigyabai|1 month ago Like macOS, my cat does not qualify for the UNIX standard out-of-the-box and I'm far too lazy to configure my cat for an OS standard that's 25 years obsolete.
shiomiru|1 month ago > as we know it todayAn important nuance you seem to be missing is that SUSv3 is equivalent to "IEEE Std 1003.1-2001" (that is, POSIX 2001).In practice, I've had to work around more POSIX compatibility issues in macOS than in all other actively developed (Free) Unix-likes, combined.
remix2000|1 month ago Mayhaps not with a `cat(1)` alone, but really they just need to expand their menagerie now.
bigyabai|1 month ago
shiomiru|1 month ago
An important nuance you seem to be missing is that SUSv3 is equivalent to "IEEE Std 1003.1-2001" (that is, POSIX 2001).
In practice, I've had to work around more POSIX compatibility issues in macOS than in all other actively developed (Free) Unix-likes, combined.
remix2000|1 month ago