[Nemo_bis]

The first point already exists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societas_Europaea

The second point is dubious. A central registry may be better or worse than the best national registry.

The third and fourth are what is usually called the Capital Markets Union in eurobubble speak: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_Markets_Union

The Draghi report had some specific proposals which are rather realistic:

> Reduce capital market fragmentation > > A. Introduce a European Security Exchange Commission > > B. Reduce regulatory fragmentation to deepen the CMU > > C. Encourage retail investors through the offer of second pillar pension schemes where the successful examples of some EU Member States can be replicated. > > D. Assess whether further changes to the capital requirements under Solvency II are warranted by further reducing the capital charges on equity investments held for the long term.

https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/97e481fd-2dc3...

https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/ec1409c1-d4b4... (p. 292)

[M2Ys4U]

>The first point already exists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societas_Europaea

SEs are public companies, and must have at least €120k in capital during formation.

The proposed EU Inc. will be for private companies with no capital requirements.

[Nemo_bis]

SE companies can be unlisted, if that's what you mean.

The capital requirements can be changed.