top | item 46710287

(no title)

cvoss | 1 month ago

The issue is really focused on the grammatical function of the word. The researcher is arguing that it's not ever used as an interjection, which "whoa" always is.

discuss

order

zahlman|1 month ago

I would say the presence of an exclamation mark, in a context where exclamation marks are rare, is strong evidence of use as an interjection. Unless we're arguing that some other mark was mistaken for an exclamation, generally I would say rare typography is "marked" (noteworthy) rather than being likely mistaken. I think the researcher's position is not likely to hold much sway going forward.

Sharlin|1 month ago

Why would you assume the original had an exclamation mark? Indeed the whole symbol was not invented until the 1300s.