(no title)
foofoo55 | 1 month ago
At the end of the day, consumers get stable and somewhat realistic prices and supply, while farmers also get stable income.
foofoo55 | 1 month ago
At the end of the day, consumers get stable and somewhat realistic prices and supply, while farmers also get stable income.
9rx|1 month ago
Which? You can't have both. Input costs are subject to the whims of non-supply managed markets. When, say, input costs rise either the farmer has to absorb that cost (unstable income), or the cost has to be passed on to the customer (unstable consumer price).
> and supply
Oh? https://www.ctvnews.ca/atlantic/article/some-maritime-grocer..., https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/cana..., https://farmersforum.com/cracks-in-supply-management/
yetihehe|1 month ago
> Which? You can't have both
Maybe not in USA. Looks like another problem that only one developed country says is impossible to solve.