Trying to read the math behind quantum chemistry, it is never clear to me which parts are fundamental, which parts are tricks, which parts are needed just for close form expressions, which parts are computational approximations, and which are the limitations? For a subject that should be fundamental for future technological advances, and highly dependent on the growth of computation resources, it seems to me exceptionally opaque and I suspect not well presented?
lowdanie|1 month ago
Of course, the true wave function is generally not a Slater determinant. In particular, electrons in a Slater determinant with different spins are uncorrelated.
The standard approach to resolving this is density functional theory. In that model, the main approximation is the choice of an “exchange correlation functional” which approximates the electron exchange and correlation energy. The choice of a functional is unfortunately a dark art in the sense that they can only be evaluated empirically rather than from first principles.
The classic reference for Hartree Fock is Modern Quantum Chemistry by Szabo and Ostland: https://books.google.com/books/about/Modern_Quantum_Chemistr...
It is very well written and I highly recommend it.
I also wrote up some notes here: https://www.daniellowengrub.com/blog/2025/07/26/scf
empiricus|1 month ago