These days, most employees getting nothing out of the deal is par for the course for acquisitions, unfortunately. The acquisition price is almost never exchanged directly for shares in the company as implied, often a chunk of it is kept for key personnel retention, etc. Typically just enough goes towards the share purchase to make investors happy, and the rest is structured as incentives for founders and key execs with milestone payouts. That‘s the set of people with leverage towards making the acquisition happen, so that‘s who gets paid.
If you‘re just a regular employee with some options, and the acquirer doesn‘t want to keep you on, you should expect nothing.
> Typically just enough goes towards the share purchase to make investors happy, and the rest is structured as incentives for founders and key execs with milestone payouts.
So they're getting the employees' shares without compensating the employees?
And there's incentives paid to the people who approved the deal, separate from their shares?
(I've heard of liquidation preferences, but never by the person making a job offer with stock options. Bribery also never came up.)
While I don't think it's the case here, but a lot of time there is more liquidity preference than the deal value so employees can only get what investor want them to pay.
zamfi|1 month ago
If you‘re just a regular employee with some options, and the acquirer doesn‘t want to keep you on, you should expect nothing.
neilv|1 month ago
So they're getting the employees' shares without compensating the employees?
And there's incentives paid to the people who approved the deal, separate from their shares?
(I've heard of liquidation preferences, but never by the person making a job offer with stock options. Bribery also never came up.)
hopelite|1 month ago
[deleted]
rahimnathwani|1 month ago
Early employees' options will have value, but more recent options are likely underwater.
bpodgursky|1 month ago
itake|1 month ago
YetAnotherNick|1 month ago
Carrok|1 month ago
Bitter about VCs? Me? Never.