It's fascinating that you can get to the level of atomic material properties as a spinning top hacker. Diamond seems like it'd be the obvious winner, if you could somehow get a perfectly polished and smooth surface.
I'd love to see a small Prince Rupert's drop for a tip and a ruby/sapphire spinning surface - you'd need to make a ton of drops, probably, but having a round, nearly spherical contact geometry and super smooth surface seems like a winning combo.
I saw this and, while interesting and impressive, this isn't really a spinning top. It's a gyroscope. I was hoping for a real like "I cast metal into the perfect shape that I physically derived somehow to last as long as possible" or something similar not just "I put a motor in a case and it spins"
Freaked me out for a second and had to double check that my tablet comes with a stop watch without having to download an app WITH ADS!!!!! Does he earn money for displaying these ads in his video too? I find it hard to believe that a content creator with sponsors is forced to use an ad supported app. Something about it being a stopwatch really just adds the cherry on top
At around the end of the fidget spinner craze I thought "but what would it take to make it spin by its own?" And it turned out, not much. Just put one magnet at each of the three ends, and have some pulsating magnet near it (next to it, or under it hidden in some kind of base), and there! you have a basic electric motor that seems entirely magical.
It was a really fun experiment; I even toyed with doing a small production run but by the time I was almost ready the craze had passed.
Saw this last week, really enjoyed the tenacity in problem-solving!!
Did make me wonder if you could build a solid state one using well-timed pulses through an electromagnet that provide torque through the field interaction with the earth's magnetic field.
Not much torque available there obviously, but on a per-revolution basis you don't need much.
The physics of magnetic torquing maybe could probably work in most if not all locations on Earth for a sufficiently small and power dense vertical top that spins sufficiently slow. Want the smallest possible local dot product of gravity vector and magnetic field for an ordinary top (without considering "sideways" tops), which may lead to better performance in some locations on Earth (could map this with e.g. IGRF). 3D field actuation would be beneficial to allow higher efficiency and longer periods of actuation around the window where the Earth's magnetic field is maximized in the spun plane, while minimizing imbalance: this actuation timing is probably the only strategy that would make practical sense for most of the magnetic power, because you will need to take a break once in a while for sensing. Another practically difficult part would be avoiding on-board soft iron noise in magnetic field, because higher spin speed would require the device and environment to damp out the device-induced magnetic field at a higher minimum rate to afford any budget for accurate sensing of the background field during the "off"-time. That is: sensing trades with spin speed because it takes non-zero time and requires a stable environment.
To implement this, I think you'd first want to test in a controlled environment with a larger magnetic field and then gradually turn down the applied field until it is Earth-like. I am honestly unsure whether you could practically get there, so earlier I used the words "maybe could", but humans are crazy so I appended the "probably".
I love projects like this. Taking something trivially simple and asking "but what if we really optimized it?"
The material science discussion in these comments is fascinating. Never thought about how the contact point geometry matters so much. Diamond tip makes intuitive sense for hardness, but then you need something it can spin on without scratching...
An interesting fact is that spinning tops are extremely ancient toys.
For instance, a spinning top is already mentioned in the Iliad of Homer, where he compares the rotation of a certain warrior after receiving a very strong off-center strike with the rotation of a spinning top ("strombo-" in Ancient Greek).
My mind immediately went towards Battlebots when I saw electronics getting involved. I wonder what else would need to be done to make this steerable over RC? There may be a lower weight class where some nicely CNC'ed 'Phantasm Orbs' can score reasonable points.
This already exists- there's a class of robot called "meltybrains" which spin the whole robot using one or more wheel, detect the speed of spinning with a gyro and modulate the speed of the wheels at different points in its' rotation in order to create translational movement. Since they effectively put all the weight allowance into the "weapon" they can be very effective. The additional complexity means that they are hard to get working reliably in chaotic combat conditions. A team called "Project liftoff" had some serious success though.
Coriolis forces appear only on objects that have a translation motion relative to the Earth, and which also has a direction distinct from that of the rotation of the Earth, i.e. either a north to south (or reverse) or vertical motion.
If the axis of the spinning top is stationary relatively to Earth, there are no Coriolis forces.
For a big spinning top, there could be non-negligible periodic Coriolis forces acting on the periphery of the spinning top, but they would be compensated by the rigidity of the top and in any case their average over a complete rotation of the top would be null.
this guy is super great but wow do the juvenile sexist comments he makes (over and over again, tripling down on them) detract from the overall value of the video. Would female engineering students really appreciate all that? I think not
barbegal|1 month ago
observationist|1 month ago
I'd love to see a small Prince Rupert's drop for a tip and a ruby/sapphire spinning surface - you'd need to make a ton of drops, probably, but having a round, nearly spherical contact geometry and super smooth surface seems like a winning combo.
direwolf20|1 month ago
chankstein38|1 month ago
anfractuosity|1 month ago
mariocesar|1 month ago
Awesome!
johndough|1 month ago
a2dam|1 month ago
chankstein38|1 month ago
pelf|1 month ago
dylan604|1 month ago
VladVladikoff|1 month ago
iberator|1 month ago
bambax|1 month ago
At around the end of the fidget spinner craze I thought "but what would it take to make it spin by its own?" And it turned out, not much. Just put one magnet at each of the three ends, and have some pulsating magnet near it (next to it, or under it hidden in some kind of base), and there! you have a basic electric motor that seems entirely magical.
It was a really fun experiment; I even toyed with doing a small production run but by the time I was almost ready the craze had passed.
nomel|1 month ago
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-NII1RdlcQ
direwolf20|1 month ago
isaacn|1 month ago
inanutshellus|1 month ago
jcims|1 month ago
Did make me wonder if you could build a solid state one using well-timed pulses through an electromagnet that provide torque through the field interaction with the earth's magnetic field.
Not much torque available there obviously, but on a per-revolution basis you don't need much.
alhirzel|1 month ago
To implement this, I think you'd first want to test in a controlled environment with a larger magnetic field and then gradually turn down the applied field until it is Earth-like. I am honestly unsure whether you could practically get there, so earlier I used the words "maybe could", but humans are crazy so I appended the "probably".
This would be a fun YouTube video to watch.
metalman|1 month ago
https://hackaday.com/2021/12/01/supersonic-projectile-exceed...
ReptileMan|1 month ago
augusteo|1 month ago
The material science discussion in these comments is fascinating. Never thought about how the contact point geometry matters so much. Diamond tip makes intuitive sense for hardness, but then you need something it can spin on without scratching...
adrian_b|1 month ago
For instance, a spinning top is already mentioned in the Iliad of Homer, where he compares the rotation of a certain warrior after receiving a very strong off-center strike with the rotation of a spinning top ("strombo-" in Ancient Greek).
tartoran|1 month ago
slfreference|1 month ago
https://youtu.be/0Yubn6P5DUw
Terretta|1 month ago
gigaflop|1 month ago
everyday7732|1 month ago
oriettaxx|1 month ago
I am curious:
* will spinning *direction* (clockwise, or anti-clockwise) effect spinning duration?
* and being in Northern Hemisphere vs South Hemisphere (Coriolis effect)?
adrian_b|1 month ago
If the axis of the spinning top is stationary relatively to Earth, there are no Coriolis forces.
For a big spinning top, there could be non-negligible periodic Coriolis forces acting on the periphery of the spinning top, but they would be compensated by the rigidity of the top and in any case their average over a complete rotation of the top would be null.
dmoy|1 month ago
How long would a better battery go here?
I'm curious what the jump from 2-> 40+ hours requires
rationalist|1 month ago
1shooner|1 month ago
Espressosaurus|1 month ago
zzzeek|1 month ago
bdamm|1 month ago
huzaifah0x00|1 month ago
[deleted]