top | item 46729461 Korea's AI law requires watermarks on generated content 5 points| BaudouinVH | 1 month ago |koreajoongangdaily.joins.com 3 comments order hn newest OsrsNeedsf2P|1 month ago Korea is in an interesting situation to do this; if the USA did it, people outside the US would make English AI generated videos. But who outside of Korea is going to make Korean AI generated videos? BaudouinVH|1 month ago But concerns remain over whether the requirement can be enforced in practice, as watermark-removal applications remain widely available. OsrsNeedsf2P|1 month ago It seems like the law is more downscoped than the title implies:> The rules apply only to businesses, not individual users.I can't think of a business that would be incentivized to dewatermark videos - they just wouldn't watermark them in the first place
OsrsNeedsf2P|1 month ago Korea is in an interesting situation to do this; if the USA did it, people outside the US would make English AI generated videos. But who outside of Korea is going to make Korean AI generated videos?
BaudouinVH|1 month ago But concerns remain over whether the requirement can be enforced in practice, as watermark-removal applications remain widely available. OsrsNeedsf2P|1 month ago It seems like the law is more downscoped than the title implies:> The rules apply only to businesses, not individual users.I can't think of a business that would be incentivized to dewatermark videos - they just wouldn't watermark them in the first place
OsrsNeedsf2P|1 month ago It seems like the law is more downscoped than the title implies:> The rules apply only to businesses, not individual users.I can't think of a business that would be incentivized to dewatermark videos - they just wouldn't watermark them in the first place
OsrsNeedsf2P|1 month ago
BaudouinVH|1 month ago
OsrsNeedsf2P|1 month ago
> The rules apply only to businesses, not individual users.
I can't think of a business that would be incentivized to dewatermark videos - they just wouldn't watermark them in the first place