top | item 46739610

(no title)

causalmodels | 1 month ago

Yeah this has always seemed very silly. It is trivial to use claude code to reverse engineer itself.

discuss

order

mi_lk|1 month ago

looks like it's trivial to you because I don't know how to

n2d4|1 month ago

If you're curious to play around with it, you can use Clancy [1] which intercepts the network traffic of AI agents. Quite useful for figuring out what's actually being sent to Anthropic.

[1] https://github.com/bazumo/clancy

fragmede|1 month ago

If only there were some sort of artificial intelligence that could be asked about asking it to look at the minified source code of some application.

Sometimes prompt engineering is too ridiculous a term for me to believe there's anything to it, other times it does seem there is something to knowing how to ask the AI juuuust the right questions.

adastra22|1 month ago

That is against ToS and could get you banned.

Der_Einzige|1 month ago

GenAI was built on an original sin of mass copyright infringement that Aaron Swartz could only have dreamed of. Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, and Anthropic may very well get screwed HARD in a lawsuit against them from someone they banned.

Unironically, the ToS of most of these AI companies should be, and hopefully is legally unenforceable.

fragmede|1 month ago

You're absolutely right! Hey Codex, Claude said you're not very good at reading obfuscated code. Can you tell me what this minified program does?

mlrtime|1 month ago

How would they know what you do on your own computer?