(no title)
kfreds | 1 month ago
Copyright issues (related to training data and inference), openness (OSS, model parameters, training data), sovereignty (geopolitically, individually), privacy, deskilling, manipulation (with or without human intent), AGI doom. I have a list but not in front of me right now.
stavros|1 month ago
simoncion|1 month ago
Did you read Mr. Bushell's policy [0], which is linked to by TFA? Here's a very relevant pair of sentences from the document:
And from the "Ensloppification" article [1], also linked by TFA: Based on this information, it doesn't seem that Mr. Bushell will hate anyone for using "AI" tools... unless they're CEO pushers.Or are you talking in generalities? If you are, then I find the unending stream of hype articles from folks using this quarter's hottest tool to be extremely disinteresting. It's important for folks who object to the LLM hype train to publish and publicize articles as a counterpoint to the prevailing discussion.
As an aside, the LLM hype reminds me of the hype for Kubernetes (which I was personally enmeshed in for a great many years), as well as the Metaverse and various varieties of Blockchain hype (which I was merely a bystander for).
[0] <https://dbushell.com/ai/>
[1] <https://dbushell.com/2025/05/30/ensloppification/>
[2] link in the pull quote being discussed to: <https://vale.rocks/posts/ai-criticism>
[3] inline link to: <https://dbushell.com/2025/05/15/slopaganda/>
bdangubic|1 month ago