top | item 46743916 (no title) lovebeans | 1 month ago Yes and this is a good thing. No organization, no matter how large or powerful, should be beyond the reach of the law. discuss order hn newest preisschild|1 month ago Ideally they wouldnt even have this key / the private data in the first place lovebeans|1 month ago The user can opt out of this if they want. load replies (1) stabbles|1 month ago That's a false dichotomy. You can hold an organization accountable to the law without requiring them to maintain a "master key" to your private data. lovebeans|1 month ago It isn't required. Dylan16807|1 month ago I have no idea what you mean. If the user keys were protected, that would not put Microsoft beyond the reach of the law. To Microsoft it's just a few bytes they never do anything with.
preisschild|1 month ago Ideally they wouldnt even have this key / the private data in the first place lovebeans|1 month ago The user can opt out of this if they want. load replies (1)
stabbles|1 month ago That's a false dichotomy. You can hold an organization accountable to the law without requiring them to maintain a "master key" to your private data. lovebeans|1 month ago It isn't required.
Dylan16807|1 month ago I have no idea what you mean. If the user keys were protected, that would not put Microsoft beyond the reach of the law. To Microsoft it's just a few bytes they never do anything with.
preisschild|1 month ago
lovebeans|1 month ago
stabbles|1 month ago
lovebeans|1 month ago
Dylan16807|1 month ago