(no title)
birken | 1 month ago
Hard to keep up with all the changes and it would be nice to see a high level view of what people are using and how that might be shifting over time.
birken | 1 month ago
Hard to keep up with all the changes and it would be nice to see a high level view of what people are using and how that might be shifting over time.
samsolomon|1 month ago
https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/code
Also, I'm not sure if it's exactly the case but I think you can look at throughput of the models on openrouter and get an idea of how fast/expensive they are.
https://openrouter.ai/minimax/minimax-m2.1
unknown|1 month ago
[deleted]
7777777phil|1 month ago
danjl|1 month ago
hmottestad|1 month ago
Kerrick|1 month ago
mudkipdev|1 month ago
simoncion|1 month ago
Why would you want a list with such godawful methodology? Here's [0] what the TIOBE folks have to say about their data analysis process:
The only advantage this methodology has is it's extremely cheap for the surveyor to use.[0] <https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/programminglanguages_defin...>
nikcub|1 month ago
Also 75% darwin-arm64
morley|1 month ago
https://thezvi.substack.com/
His newsletter put me onto using Opus 4.5 exclusively on Dec 1, a little over a week after it was released. That's pretty good for a few minutes of reading a week.
xyzsparetimexyz|1 month ago
unknown|1 month ago
[deleted]
ramoz|1 month ago
anhner|1 month ago
fragmede|1 month ago
thevinter|1 month ago
nonethewiser|1 month ago
Can you help me envision what you're saying? It's async - you will have to wait whether its good or not. And in theory the better it is the more time you'd have to comment here, right?
g947o|1 month ago
unknown|1 month ago
[deleted]