top | item 46751298 (no title) oasisaimlessly | 1 month ago It's a uint32_t of 750 Hz "jiffies", which does overflow at ~66 days. discuss order hn newest userbinator|1 month ago While that seems like a convincing explanation, 750Hz is a rather odd value to use for a timer, and more importantly the overflow would be at 66d6h43m43s instead of the reported ~66d12h. i_am_proteus|1 month ago It is indeed the explanation: https://github.com/NVIDIA/open-gpu-kernel-modules/pull/1014 fc417fc802|1 month ago 66 days 12 hours would put it at 747.5 Hz. A different report had 66 days 10 hours 16 minutes which works out to 748 Hz.Maybe the clock was just feeling a little sluggish? /s loeg|1 month ago Wild.
userbinator|1 month ago While that seems like a convincing explanation, 750Hz is a rather odd value to use for a timer, and more importantly the overflow would be at 66d6h43m43s instead of the reported ~66d12h. i_am_proteus|1 month ago It is indeed the explanation: https://github.com/NVIDIA/open-gpu-kernel-modules/pull/1014 fc417fc802|1 month ago 66 days 12 hours would put it at 747.5 Hz. A different report had 66 days 10 hours 16 minutes which works out to 748 Hz.Maybe the clock was just feeling a little sluggish? /s
i_am_proteus|1 month ago It is indeed the explanation: https://github.com/NVIDIA/open-gpu-kernel-modules/pull/1014
fc417fc802|1 month ago 66 days 12 hours would put it at 747.5 Hz. A different report had 66 days 10 hours 16 minutes which works out to 748 Hz.Maybe the clock was just feeling a little sluggish? /s
userbinator|1 month ago
i_am_proteus|1 month ago
fc417fc802|1 month ago
Maybe the clock was just feeling a little sluggish? /s
loeg|1 month ago