[Karsteski]

This has absolutely nothing to do with the article. The entire point was the political rat race to obtain the first mover advantage to eventually monopolize local markets, backed by government hindrance to competition.

We've seen this happen time and time again. Just look at what OpenAI tried to do with their AI safety bullshit. They're the "only ones" that can distribute AI safely lest it destroy us all. No ulterior motives there whatsoever.

[EdwardDiego]

Maybe he shouldn't have included it in his article then, because I promptly disengaged with the article immediately after that.

[chickenimprint]

Information about an author can be evidence in support of or against the credibility of their claims.