[abernard1]

Whatever the epithets, the truth of the matter is those urban areas are closer to what Canada aspires to be (and currently is). Whereas the parts of Canada she cares about are alive and well in the US (and used to be more like what Canada was).

The question becomes: if you're traveling on a line, and you see the destination looks dark ahead of you, do you turn around or keep going?

Canada's notoriously polite deference led them to align with those powerful tech, marketing, and financial hubs in the US. A cheerleader on the sidelines. But everyone gets to pick. There's a lack of acknowledgement that there's even a choice; the dog that didn't bark one could say. But it's part and parcel of why modern Canada is the way it is.

[footy]

This comment is nonsensical. The parts of Canada the author cares about are also alive and well in Canada and your entire premise is that they're not