"We're aware of the DMCA takedown notice of julialang logo by an OF creator"

[walletdrainer]

The actual takedown request: https://lumendatabase.org/notices/77402454

Looks like the bulk of the content from this reporter is not infringing, the lack of criminal penalties for these abuses is definitely a disappointing oversight.

This is not by any means accidental.

[cookiengineer]

I wanted to point out that this seems to be rotating fake companies filing complaints on behalf of this "julia.pic" person.

Note how every DMCA request is done by a different company. There's like 20+ companies that filed those DMCA requests within less than a week.

Can this even be possible? I don't know how lawyer retainers or power of attorney works in the US, but I was assuming that mandates cannot be transferred to third parties.

[DeepYogurt]

331 pages of takedowns filed by that user too

https://lumendatabase.org/faceted_search?principal_name=juli...

[afavour]

Mirror: https://nitter.net/KenoFischer/status/2014327875277602983

[ronsor]

I think the simplest way to fix the DMCA system is to make it so that if you send too many false takedowns, you lose the right to use it entirely.

[andreareina]

There's already a statutory penalty for false claims, it just needs to be enforced.

[liveoneggs]

you need to go after the services/brokers who send them

[hyperhello]

“OF Creator” sounds like “sanitation engineer”. As though garbage man and stripper were less than honorable jobs.

[keybored]

Well they are a stripper specifically on OF. “OF stripper”?

The way we talk about all people who make videos, photos, images, and so on is already perfectly uniform: content creator.

[Cpoll]

The paranoid conclusion is that you need to name all your files random strings to avoid a DMCA scattershot.

[narcraft]

Which OF creator?

[walletdrainer]

https://www.onlyfans.com/julia.pic