top | item 46760614

(no title)

resoluteteeth | 1 month ago

Suppose that we were able to develop a drug that would allow people to regrow lost limbs through gene editing.

Do you think that such a drug should not be given to anyone who lost a limb due in an accident that was partly due to their own poor judgement because it was "down to choices made"?

Also, is there something special about gene editing that means it should not be used for these situations? Or if you go outside when it's icy and fall and break a bone, should the hospital refuse to treat you since that was your own fault?

discuss

order

nuc1e0n|1 month ago

I can't see how genetic modification would be the correct way to treat such injuries.

Maybe substances that can trigger epigenetic effects would be more relevant to such things. I understand a Japanese team is working on a means of triggering tooth regrowth by means of an injection. I've got no problem with that. Or something like Skele-Gro from Harry Potter either.