top | item 46761198 (no title) jcparkyn | 1 month ago It's only semantically a pass-by-value, in reality a reference is passed and the data is only copied if needed (i.e. value is mutated while shared). discuss order hn newest zahlman|1 month ago So the language has reference semantics, and (per the edit) for every object (like in Python)?(Ah, no, your example elsewhere in the thread suggests that the referred-to structures get implicitly copied all over the place.) jcparkyn|1 month ago Nope, it's value semantics (unlike Python), the references are just an internal optimization. Implicit copies happen when a list/dict with more than one reference is mutated. load replies (1)
zahlman|1 month ago So the language has reference semantics, and (per the edit) for every object (like in Python)?(Ah, no, your example elsewhere in the thread suggests that the referred-to structures get implicitly copied all over the place.) jcparkyn|1 month ago Nope, it's value semantics (unlike Python), the references are just an internal optimization. Implicit copies happen when a list/dict with more than one reference is mutated. load replies (1)
jcparkyn|1 month ago Nope, it's value semantics (unlike Python), the references are just an internal optimization. Implicit copies happen when a list/dict with more than one reference is mutated. load replies (1)
zahlman|1 month ago
(Ah, no, your example elsewhere in the thread suggests that the referred-to structures get implicitly copied all over the place.)
jcparkyn|1 month ago