[dissent]

There's a big difference between being a party member actually in a government position (war related, no less), and being a businessman surviving under that regime. You're not only making an absurd comparison, you're calling for punishment for somebody who hasn't even remotely broken any laws. Can't you see you're being authoritarian?

[politelemon]

Law and morality are not the same thing. The apologism for Apple on HN is comically and selectively gymnastics. I think the biggest shame here is the brand identity for a corporation that many of you have self deluded into adopting. Even now the voices that tell you to stop bootlicking them and warning against them get shouted down.

[dissent]

That may be true, but if you think your definition of morality is correct and anybody who thinks otherwise needs to be punished, then no wonder you've ended up with an authoritarian who's beaten you at your own game.

It's also got nothing to do with Apple fanboyism. The same is true for all corporations in the US.

[dpkirchner]

Somehow I doubt Tim Cook would have trouble surviving if he did not choose to bend the knee.

[dissent]

He might be lynched by his shareholders :)

[fireflash38]

It's why Hugo Boss is only a footnote in history for being a huge part of the Nazi regime right? Right?

Nope. Other way around. Their Nazi support is a footnote in their Wikipedia page.

[dissent]

Come on, it was the 1930s, in Germany and Hitler and the Nazis (the real ones we got the name from) were actually in power. You're comparing apples to potatoes.