[zahirbmirza]

The push toward LED seems to be primarily for emission target related reasons. It is very hard to buy incandescent bulbs in the UK; even for those of us that accept the cost implications. Also, many less expensive LEDs flicker at the rate of the frequency supply of the current (ie 240 or 120 Hz). This is very annoying and related to the instantaneous response of LED vs the averaging effect of the alternating current through an actual glowing hot filament. It is interesting to read on the development of blue and white LED technology.

[wongarsu]

In the EU this was indeed done for energy efficiency/emissions. Incandescent bulbs were gradually banned from normal sale, starting with the most energy hungry (diffused 100W) and gradually expanding until only low-wattage and special-purpose bulbs were left. Special-purpose bulbs cover a large variety for everything where switching didn't make sense, like machine shops or historic buildings. LEDs aren't mandated per se, but they are the most attractive alternative. And because this all happened before brexit the UK has the same rules, unless they revised any of them post-brexit

For the most part this was a very positive step. Prices for LED bulbs plunged when they went from the "premium" energy-efficient alternative to the default option. But you also get a lot of crap on the market, and stuffing LEDs in form factors designed for incandescent bulbs makes good electrical and thermal design challenging. Even for those brands that actually try

[fundatus]

> LEDs aren't mandated per se, but they are the most attractive alternative.

Yeah, basically what the EU did was to say: For X Watts of electricity at least X Lumen of light has to be produced. And this number was gradually increased. Since old school light bulbs are quite inefficient when it comes to producing light, they slowly had to be phased out.

[leoedin]

> The push toward LED seems to be primarily for emission target related reasons

Is this true? I’ve got LEDs in my house because they cost vastly less to run, and because I rarely have to replace the bulbs.

Some cheap LEDs do flicker (at 50 or 60 Hz). But that’s fairly easily solved. I don’t think I’ve noticed the flicker since some cheap bulbs I bought in 2014 or so.

[JKCalhoun]

"I don’t think I’ve noticed the flicker…"

Well… (Sorry, let me put my tinfoil hat on.) Yeah, well that noticed part is what is worrisome to me. I do worry that there is some effect on our brains even though we might not perceive the flicker.

As an analogy, I got into those supposedly audiophile "Class D" (or "Class T") amplifiers over a decade ago. Every day I turned on the music in my office and coded with the T-amp playing. I would have told you at the time that, indeed, it sounded amazing.

Some time later I built a tube amplifier (The Darling [2], in case anyone cares—I've since built perhaps a dozen more).

When I brought it into the office and swapped it out for the T-amp, the change was sublime but immediately noticeable. I hate to fall back on audiophile terminology but it's the best I have for the experience: I was suddenly aware of "listening fatigue" that had been a component of the T-amp. I hadn't even known it had been fatiguing until I heard the tube amp in its place for days on end.

With the loss of color fidelity and the flickering issue, I'm embarrassed to say that incandescent is starting to look good to me again.

I might, as an experiment, replace only those lights that we turn on in the evening when we are relaxing, reading.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class-T_amplifier

[2] https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/darling-1626-amp.... and https://imgur.com/gallery/oh-darling-tube-amplifier-Lq2Sx

[graemep]

> Is this true? I’ve got LEDs in my house because they cost vastly less to run, and because I rarely have to replace the bulbs.

its the same thing. If it uses less electricity it both reduces the cost to you and reduces emissions from generating electricity.

I think most people would have switched over gradually anyway, but effectively banning incandescents speeded it up.

[DeathArrow]

>Is this true? I’ve got LEDs in my house because they cost vastly less to run, and because I rarely have to replace the bulbs.

At least in EU is true. Citing from Wikipedia: "The 2005 Ecodesign directive covered energy-using products (EuP), which use, generate, transfer or measure energy, including consumer goods such as boilers, water heaters, computers, televisions, and industrial products such as transformers. The implementing measures focus on those products which have a high potential for reducing greenhouse gas emissions at low cost, through reduced energy demand."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecodesign_Directive

[SoftTalker]

I have not found that LED bulbs last noticably longer than incandescents. I'm still replacing bulbs, and though I don't keep records it feels about the same.

LEDs are just terrible in every way except electrical consumption.

[zahirbmirza]

It does seem an easy win for govts to easily conform.

I buy the ones that are suitable for dimmable switches (even tho I don't have dimmers) because there is discernible flicker with most other LED bulbs if you for eg wave your arm through the air or made a saccade. There is a certification (i think) for LED bulbs that are closer to sunlight in their emission spectrum

[Sharlin]

LED bulbs, even though cheaper in the long term, used to habe high enough shelf prices enough that most houdeholds wouldn’t have switched without a government push. Incandescents are literally banned now for most uses, while the economies of scale have helped drive LED prices down.

[axus]

It costs less to run because less energy is used; I'm pretty sure incandescent bulbs aren't emitting anything by themself! "The push" is from the government, perhaps consumer demand is "the pull".

[NwtnsMthd]

The flickering is solely a result of cost cutting in the power supplies of these LED lights. The problem is totally solvable with a constant current switching power supply. But the filtering circuitry adds cost.

[graemep]

The problem is that consumers usually cannot know this about a particular light (or a lot more) at the point of purchase, so even if you are willing to pay a premium for this you cannot.

I would pay a premium for longer life, and at least in some cases (e.g. lights I read by) for better quality. How do I do so? I would love to be pointed at sources of better ones (in the UK).

[palmotea]

> The push toward LED seems to be primarily for emission target related reasons. It is very hard to buy incandescent bulbs in the UK; even for those of us that accept the cost implications.

Can you even buy them without buying new old stock? In the US they're banned and there's zero production.

I recall there was a guy in the EU who tried to get around the regulations by selling "heat bulbs" that were exactly the same as traditional incandescent bulbs but marketed as a heat source, but I think he was slapped down.

[wongarsu]

At least in Germany you can still fairly easily get 20W incandescent lamps. Sold as lamps for fridges and ovens, but they are available with standard sockets.

If you look around a bit you can also get 60W or 100W lamps, sold as "industrial lamps" or "extreme temperature lamps", labeled as unsuitable for household use. But those are specialty lamps that you won't find in your local supermarket. Not sure if those are new old stock or imported

[nerdponx]

Certain size/watt combos are still available for things like appliances and nightlights, but I think that includes 20W E26/A-something bulbs, and the bulbs for plug-in night lights. I can still find them on the Home Depot and some other places. No idea about quality but I still prefer how they look. There are so many other horrible energy efficiency problems with heating my home that the inefficiency of a few incandescents in key places doesn't bother me in comparison to the enjoyment I get from the nice light.

[mark-r]

In the US they've even banned selling new old stock. I believe that was a recent change within the last few years.

[oniony]

If I were able to see the flicker of mains supplied LED lighting (which I cannot), then I would be very tempted to install low-voltage DC LED lighting, which presumably does not flicker.

[stubish]

An AC/DC power converter works the same, either built into the bulb or in a separate unit. But yes, a separate power converter is almost certainly going to do a much better job of removing the 50/60Hz voltage drop. Not sure if it would be cheaper, given the economies of scale on AC bulb manufacture. Higher quality AC bulbs may come out ahead for flicker free lighting.

[lightedman]

It only doesn't flicker if there's no power driving circuitry - eg just LEDs and a resistor.

Otherwise, if there is a power IC present, there is flicker, though fast enough for most humans to not perceive normally (you can still check it by waving your hand in front of the light and seeing the strobed afterimage.)

[fyrn_]

Wouldn't the supply usually be either 50hz or 60hz depending in the country?

[stubish]

Yes, OP incorrectly quoted voltage rather than frequency.