[dicroce]

This is actually pretty incredible. Cannot really argue against the productivity in this case.

[mythical_39]

one possible argument against the productivity is if the mirgration introduced too many bugs to be useable.

In which case the code produced has zero value, resulting in a wasted month.

[Sharlin]

I suppose what’s impressive is that (with the author’s help) it did ultimately get the port to work, in spite of all the caveats described by the author that make Claude sound like a really bad programmer. The code is likely terrible, and the 3.5x speedup way low compared to what it could be, but I guess these days we’re supposed to be impressed by quantity rather than quality.

[citizenpaul]

Its not. The project does not work or actually implement anything. It just compiles and passes some arbitrary tests the author wrote.

[woeirua]

We must have a different definition of arbitrary. OP ran 2.3 million tests comparing random battles against the original implementation? Which is probably what you or I would do if we were given this task without an LLM.