[rfw300]

This is true as a technical matter, but this isn't a technical blog post! It's a consumer review, and when companies ship consumer products, the people who use them can't be expected to understand failure modes that are not clearly communicated to them. If OpenAI wants regular people to dump their data into ChatGPT for Health, the onus is on them to make it reliable.

[themafia]

> the onus is on them to make it reliable.

That is not a plausible outcome given the current technology or of any of OpenAI's demonstrated capabilities.

"If Bob's Hacksaw Surgery Center wants to stay in business they have to stop killing patients!"

Perhaps we should just stop him before it goes too far?

[vineyardmike]

> That is not a plausible outcome given the current technology or of any of OpenAI's demonstrated capabilities

OpenAI has said that medical advice was one of their biggest use-cases they saw from users. It should be assumed they're investigating how to build out this product capability.

Google has LLMs fine tuned on medical data. I have a friend who works at a top-tier US medical research university, and the university is regularly working with ML research labs to generate doctor-annotated training data. OpenAI absolutely could be involved in creating such a product using this sort of source.

You can feed an LLM text, pictures, videos, audio, etc - why not train a model to accept medical-time-series data as another modality? Obviously this could have a negative performance impact on a coding model, but could potentially be valuable for a consumer-oriented chat bot. Or, of course, they could create a dedicated model and tool-call that model.