top | item 46786470

(no title)

nkohari | 1 month ago

> by force, intimidation, or threat

You seem to be glossing over the key piece of that statute. Peaceful protest is protected by the first amendment (free speech, right to assembly).

discuss

order

knubie|1 month ago

Intimidation, or threat at the very least seems applicable here if you have any idea of what's going on in Minnesota and what these Signal chats are being used for.

mycodendral|1 month ago

This statute defines the conditions where free speech transitions to criminal activity.

You can interpret it however you like.

refurb|1 month ago

Blocking law enforcement's vehicles and their person (I saw several protestors put hands on officers), when they are conducting arrests, certainly seems to fit the bill.

sb057|1 month ago

If you threaten to kill somebody then follow them around for days at a time, is that intimidation?

zahlman|1 month ago

[deleted]

VBprogrammer|1 month ago

I've seen pictures of someone with a damaged finger. Given the wild differences between video evidence and what the top levels of the administration claim happen, I think a healthy degree of scepticism is warrented.

Could easily have been hurt by their own flashbang devices or caught it in a car door.

nkohari|1 month ago

I haven't seen the supposed Signal logs, but I'm confident that there wasn't a conspiracy to bite someone's finger.