top | item 46794550 (no title) blueflow | 1 month ago alternate libc's like musl. the eglibc controversy showed this was necessary but poettering initially refused to support a "non-useful libc". his words. discuss order hn newest embedding-shape|1 month ago But musl exists today? And even I use it from time to time, mostly I think in Alpine Linux. How was musl hindered if we can use it?Maybe it isn't as popular as you would have wanted, but I don't think that's the same as claiming it's been hindered by systemd. egorfine|1 month ago > But musl exists todayYes and the systemd crowd wants to embrace and extinguish it as well [1][1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/v259-rc1/NEWS load replies (2)
embedding-shape|1 month ago But musl exists today? And even I use it from time to time, mostly I think in Alpine Linux. How was musl hindered if we can use it?Maybe it isn't as popular as you would have wanted, but I don't think that's the same as claiming it's been hindered by systemd. egorfine|1 month ago > But musl exists todayYes and the systemd crowd wants to embrace and extinguish it as well [1][1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/v259-rc1/NEWS load replies (2)
egorfine|1 month ago > But musl exists todayYes and the systemd crowd wants to embrace and extinguish it as well [1][1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/v259-rc1/NEWS load replies (2)
embedding-shape|1 month ago
Maybe it isn't as popular as you would have wanted, but I don't think that's the same as claiming it's been hindered by systemd.
egorfine|1 month ago
Yes and the systemd crowd wants to embrace and extinguish it as well [1]
[1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/v259-rc1/NEWS