[volkk]

i've been using AI for as long as GPT has been out, so if you can't see through the rambling, overly complex to make you sound smarter kind of text, as well as the written patterns that are always used ad nauseam like "this thing isn't JUST this, it's THIS" -- i dunno how else to prove it to you. IYKYK.

[tannerc]

I have also used GPTs since 2020. I am also a writer. Much of the writing equated with “generated by AI” is so precisely because it’s broadly trained on real writing.

So the claim of “AI slop” without proof is little more than heresy. It would be helpful to have any evidence.

It’s not about just the writing in one example, it’s about writing patterns—which are common—being equated with AI simply because they’re common.

[volkk]

if you're a writer, and you're using GPT for so long and you can't see it as obvious, i dunno what to tell you at this point. i guess LLMs are trained particularly on this guy's writing.

[duckmysick]

> i dunno how else to prove it to you

A prompt to generate similar output would be a good start.

[volkk]

how's this for your prompt, pal https://xcancel.com/PlumbNick/status/2016590894485385347#m

hopefully that's enough of a good start and a good end for this conversation

[esseph]

I've been writing in a contrasting style like that since probably 5th or 6th grade.

... I wonder how much the writings of a lot of autistic / borderline folks impacted the LLM writing style.