(no title)
JaggedJax | 1 month ago
I can see how frustrating it is to wade through those and they are distracting and taking time away from them actually getting things fixed up.
JaggedJax | 1 month ago
I can see how frustrating it is to wade through those and they are distracting and taking time away from them actually getting things fixed up.
djbon2112|1 month ago
bjackman|1 month ago
1. Fully human-written explanation of the issue with all the info I can add
2. As an attachment to the bug (not a PR), explicitly noted as such, an AI slop fix and a note that it makes my symptom go away.
I've been on the receiving end of one bug report in this format and I thought it was pretty helpful. Even though the AI fix was garbage, the fact that the patch made the bug go away was useful signal.
Gigachad|1 month ago
pixl97|1 month ago
Think of a scenario like
Attacker floods you with tons of AI slop to make your overloaded and at risk of making mistakes. These entries should have just enough basis in reality to avoid summary rejection.
Then the attacker puts in useful batch of code that fixes issues and injects a tricky security flaw.
If there's not a lot going on the second part is hard to pull off. But if you ruin the SnR it becomes more likely.