(no title)
kjellsbells | 1 month ago
The awkwardness for founders in London is that when they want to IPO, London doesnt have nearly as deep a pool of capital as the US, so they are potentially leaving a lot of money on the table.
kjellsbells | 1 month ago
The awkwardness for founders in London is that when they want to IPO, London doesnt have nearly as deep a pool of capital as the US, so they are potentially leaving a lot of money on the table.
tchalla|1 month ago
> What London actually built is Europe’s most efficient farm system for US acquirers. The city does the expensive, risky work of finding founders, funding early rounds, and proving product-market fit. American companies wait until the risk is de-risked, then buy the winners at discounts enabled by London’s shrinking public markets.
https://xcancel.com/aakashgupta/status/2016375397131420005
ifwinterco|1 month ago
The UK has been run by blithering idiots for decades at this point, but London has survived so far
mytailorisrich|1 month ago
hadlock|1 month ago
funkyfiddler369|1 month ago
during a game of chess: "hey why'd you make that move?"
pyuser583|1 month ago
Which frustratingly overlap with Brexit, making it hard to tell whether this is “good driving business away” or “bad driving business away.”
interludead|1 month ago
unknown|1 month ago
[deleted]
petesergeant|1 month ago
graemep|1 month ago
Its cultural diversity is a plus for most people (other than people like DHH).
The big problem with London is that it is very, very expensive.
lurk2|1 month ago
Cultural diversity is not a draw. Africa, Latin America, and Central Asia are all culturally and ethnically diverse. No one moves to any of these places.
The primary draw of a city like London is economic prosperity, which is ironically usually only made possible by ethnic homogeneity. This is the case in Britain’s former colonies (USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand), China, Saudi Arabia, etc.
Target cities become “culturally diverse” due to the arrival of migrant labor. The migrant labor itself is not seeking this diversity out for its own sake. New migrants have their movements facilitated by networks of already-landed migrants, who provide knowledge of the immigration process, employment opportunities, and material assistance to their coethnics.
These people are not moving to London because they can find people like themselves there (there are already plenty in their country of origin), nor are they moving to London because they want to experience other cultures (this was a form of conspicuous consumption that went out of fashion years ago). At best you could say they hope that the relative ethnic heterogeneity will distract from their own foreignness, but that still doesn’t amount to being drawn to diversity.
dukeyukey|1 month ago
johnisgood|1 month ago
pjc50|1 month ago
What this is, is a racist meme pretending that the significant fraction of immigrants to London who may occasionally speak their native language to each other in public is somehow a problem. Exactly equivalent to Americans panicking about Spanish.
Joeboy|1 month ago
Edit: Changed to link I like a bit more
kjellsbells|1 month ago
The net (and the UK has decades of experience in this, eg with the South Asian immigrants that arrived in the 1950s-1970s) is that while the first generation may only get to decent levels of English, their children are bilingual or monolingual in English, not monolingual in their ancestral tongue.
Occasionally you will get someone with a political axe to grind who visits an area with a lot of immigrants, doesnt hear a lot of English, and posits that there are ethnic monolingual enclaves where they cannot go. I think this is more likely to be a failure of understanding.
dukeyukey|1 month ago
rorytbyrne|1 month ago
ctrlmeta|1 month ago
Absolutely false. My god! Have you even been to London? Stop consuming propaganda from Twitter/X and Facebook. It isn't good for your mental health.
jddj|1 month ago
youngtaff|1 month ago
anonzzzies|1 month ago