top | item 46804412

(no title)

nszceta | 1 month ago

Author should consider going straight to G-CODE (skip the STL)

discuss

order

bschwindHN|1 month ago

I came here to comment this too - if your surface is entirely mathematically defined, converting that to what your 3D printer speaks is probably easier and gives better results than approximating it with triangles and then converting those triangles to G-code.