I am. Modern computers and network connections are so fast that this amounts to literally nothing. It's standard internet background noise and it's really not a problem.
> He probably thinks the internet works on static 5k html pages, while the norm is 100kb, dynamically generated pages.
I just work on web stuff that people actually use. It's 2026, thousands of requests per second is nothing. You'll probably be fine even with stock apache2 and some janky php scripts.
A single gbit line will serve a 100kB page thousand times a second without issues.
Dynamically generated pages you can't easily serve at rates in excess of tens of thousands of requests per second from commodity hardware are extremely rare.
i don’t think you realize how fast modern CPUs are. If this stresses your server out, you probably have no business hosting things publicly on that server. This person is hosting stuff on Vercel using serverless which is the root of their problem.
4 request per second is just noise. it’s like complaining about car noise when deciding to buy a house next to the freeway. Exposing things publicly on the internet means _anyone_ can try talking to your server. Real users, bots, hackers, whatever. You can’t guarantee bots are bug-free!
Dynamic content is _typically_ served to logged in users. Content that is public facing is typically cached, for obvious reasons. Of course Meta should fix this…but using Vercel and serverless in this manner is a very poor choice.
even 100 kB dynamically generated pages should be a piece of cake. if it's CRUD like (original op's site is), it should be downright trivial to transfer that much on like... shared hosting (although even a VPS would be much better).
(in original op's case, i clocked 197 requests using 20.60 MB while browsing their site for a little bit. most of it is static assets and i had caching disabled so each new pageload loaded stuff like the apple touch icons.)
honestly you could probably put it behind nginx for the statics and just use bog standard postgres or even prolly sqlite. nice bonus in that you don't have to worry about cold start times either!
JasonADrury|1 month ago
spiderfarmer|1 month ago
[deleted]
JasonADrury|1 month ago
I just work on web stuff that people actually use. It's 2026, thousands of requests per second is nothing. You'll probably be fine even with stock apache2 and some janky php scripts.
A single gbit line will serve a 100kB page thousand times a second without issues.
Dynamically generated pages you can't easily serve at rates in excess of tens of thousands of requests per second from commodity hardware are extremely rare.
lurking_swe|1 month ago
4 request per second is just noise. it’s like complaining about car noise when deciding to buy a house next to the freeway. Exposing things publicly on the internet means _anyone_ can try talking to your server. Real users, bots, hackers, whatever. You can’t guarantee bots are bug-free!
Dynamic content is _typically_ served to logged in users. Content that is public facing is typically cached, for obvious reasons. Of course Meta should fix this…but using Vercel and serverless in this manner is a very poor choice.
justcool393|1 month ago
(in original op's case, i clocked 197 requests using 20.60 MB while browsing their site for a little bit. most of it is static assets and i had caching disabled so each new pageload loaded stuff like the apple touch icons.)
honestly you could probably put it behind nginx for the statics and just use bog standard postgres or even prolly sqlite. nice bonus in that you don't have to worry about cold start times either!
direwolf20|1 month ago