(no title)
GoatInGrey | 1 month ago
My personal opinion is that while smut won't hurt anyone in of itself, LLM smut will have weird and generally negative consequences. As it will be crafted specifically for you on top of the intermittent reinforcement component of LLM generation.
estimator7292|1 month ago
The sheer amount and variety of smut books (just books) is vastly larger than anyone wants to realize. We passed the mark decades ago where there is smut available for any and every taste. Like, to the point that even LLMs are going to take a long time to put a dent in the smut market. Humans have been making smut for longer than we've had writing.
But again I don't think you're wrong, but the scale of the problem is way distorted.
MBCook|1 month ago
That’s where the danger may lie.
cal_dent|1 month ago
monksy|1 month ago
Does that exist yet. I don't think so.
bakugo|1 month ago
It's important to note that the vast majority of such books are written for a female audience, though.
bandrami|1 month ago
fragmede|1 month ago
Why, the AI's after they've gained sentience, of course.
jjmarr|1 month ago
bpavuk|1 month ago
1. you have to "jailbreak" the model first anyway, which is what's easier to do over API
2. is average layman aware of the concept of "API"? no, unlikely. apps and web portals are more convenient, which is going to lower the bar to access LLM porn
josephg|1 month ago
spicyusername|1 month ago
measurablefunc|1 month ago
BoredomIsFun|1 month ago
PunchyHamster|1 month ago
subscribed|1 month ago
Why LLM is supposed to be worse?
josephg|1 month ago
I’m not sure why that’s a bad thing though.
UltraSane|1 month ago
gehwartzen|1 month ago
I can see why Elons making the switch from cars. We certainly won’t be driving much