[deaddodo]

I love DQ. My point wasn’t that they were bad RPGs. Simply that they don’t fit within OP’s point.

Most of them could just as easily be NES/SMS games with slightly tuned down graphics; they don’t push the SNES in any meaningful way. As mentioned, that’s an intentional decision and not intended as a slight.

[jasomill]

I get your point, but "slightly tuned down" is a bit hyperbolic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLUDMrmjgjQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoyYtqi5u54

[anonymous908213]

From the context of the conversation, it was clear they were talking about the Super Famicom entries, not saying that DQXI could be demoted to a Famicom game[1]. I don't really agree with them, although I didn't feel like continuing to belabour the point at the time. I think the SFC remakes of the Famicom DQ games (1-3) add an entirely new dimension to them. Despite their influential heritage, I do not think DQ 1-3 on the Famicom stand the test of time, and I don't think they're worth playing other than for the historical value of seeing how the genre developed. Whereas I think DQ 1-3 remakes on the Super Famicom conversely absolutely do hold up as top-notch experiences.

[1] Although notably, they did release a demake of DQXI into a Super Famicom-style game!

[deaddodo]

Did you just use a Gen 8 (3DS/Switch, PS4, Xbox One) game to make a point about SNES gameplay? Did you intentionally miss the point or are you attempting to obfuscate it?

Obviously a game for modern consoles is going to be far more advanced than an NES game; even while still being quite conservative.