[phoe-krk]

The contents of this post don't match the title.

"Developers are still needed in age of AI" is not about managing unreliable compilers.

Management mistakes in form of overdelegation and underdelegation is not about managing unreliable compilers.

Software process design with explicit checkpoints is not about managing unreliable compilers.

"Dear developer, it's time to turn yourself into a manager" is not about managing unreliable compilers.

Finally, a shameless advertisement plug from an AI toolkit company responsible for creating this post is not about managing unreliable compilers either!

Okay, LLMs being unreliable and plentiful is almost about managing unreliable compilers, but only if you believe the "many have analogized LLMs with compilers" opening statement. And even if you believe it, this post contains no practical examples of unreliability or how that unreliability is managed; the whole post is generic and lacks any connection to software development practice, to the point where it seems LLM-generated as a whole.