This is a legitimate movement in my eyes. I don’t participate, but I see it as valid. This is reminiscent of the Luddite movement - a badly misunderstood movement of folks who were trying to secure labor rights guarantees in the face of automation and new tools threatening to kill large swaths of the workforce.
lukeschlather|29 days ago
Refreeze5224|29 days ago
nine_k|29 days ago
chrsstrm|29 days ago
onionisafruit|28 days ago
skybrian|29 days ago
nine_k|29 days ago
BoorishBears|29 days ago
theamk|29 days ago
In this particular case: for many people, Waymo provides a better service (clean, safer driving, etc..) than Uber or Lyft. This threatens livelihood of human Uber/Lyft drivers. If you sympathize with human Uber/Lyft drivers, and don't care about Waymo users, you want to make Waymo worse, hoping that the people will stop riding Waymo and move to Lyft/Uber instead.
One way to do so is to make riding in Waymo unpleasant, and it's certainly unpleasant when people are cutting your car off all the time!
stopbulying|29 days ago
If you deliberately impede the flow of traffic, vehicularly assault, or otherwise sabotage the health and safety of drivers, passengers, and/or pedestrians, what do you deserve?
If you cause whiplash intentionally, what do you deserve?
What would be use of equal force in self defense in response to the described attack method?
cindyllm|29 days ago
[deleted]
stinkbeetle|29 days ago
Are movements valid if they have aims that you agree with, or are economic self-interest motivated, and invalid otherwise?
bsder|29 days ago
Something in people's brains often makes them think they are anonymous when they are driving their car. Then that gets disastrously proven otherwise when they need to show up in front of a judge.