top | item 46843060

(no title)

aqme28 | 29 days ago

I've done that, but I hate the term "wet run."

I use "live run" now, which I think gets the point across without being sort of uncomfortable.

discuss

order

IgorPartola|29 days ago

--with-danger

--make-it-so

--do-the-thing

--go-nuts

--safety-off

So many fun options.

Darfk|29 days ago

I'm a fan of --safety-off. It gives off a 'aim away from face' or 'mishandle me and I'll blow a chunk out of your DB' vibe.

tetha|28 days ago

I find it important to include system information in here as well, so just copy-pasting an invocation from system A to system B does not run.

For example, our database restore script has a parameter `--yes-delete-all-data-in` and it needs to be parametrized with the PostgreSQL cluster name. So a command with `--yes-delete-all-data-in=pg-accounting` works on exactly one system and not on other systems.

torstenvl|28 days ago

It's in the UI not the command line, but I like Chromium's thisisunsafe

JsonCameron|29 days ago

I've done a few --execute --i-know-what-im-doing for some more dangerous scripts

bregma|28 days ago

    --moisten

Quekid5|29 days ago

Moist run is the way.