This brings upon an ethical dilemma soon, partly explored by a black mirror episode, where AI can call upon gig workers. What if a rogue agent gets to things done: asks gigworker1 to call a person to meet under a bridge at 4, and asks gigworker2 to put up a rock on the bridge, and asks gigworker3 to clear the obstruction and drop the rock down the bridge at 4.
None of the 3 technically knew they were culpable in a larger illegal plan made by an agent. Has something like this occured already?
The world is moving too fast for our social rules and legal system to keep up!
This was explored a bit in Daniel Suarez’s Daemon/Freedom (tm) series. By a series of small steps, people in a crowd acting on orders from, essentially, an agent assemble a weapon, murder someone, then dispose of the weapon with almost none of them aware of it.
Not ai but there was the 2017 assassination of Kim Jong-nam which was a similar situation and something which could have been organised by an ai.
Two women thought they were carrying out a harmless prank, but the substances they were instructed to use combined to form a nerve agent which killed the guy.
Not AI but I've heard car thieves operate like this - as a loose network of individuals, who do just a part of the process, which on their own are either legal, or less punishable by law than stealing the car.
One guy scouts the vechicle and observes it, another guy is called to unlock it, and bypass the ignition lock, yet another guy picks it up and drives away, with each given a veneer of deniability about what they're doing.
Extrapolate a bit to when AI is capable of long-term, complex planning, and you see why AI alignment and security are valid concerns, despite the cynicism we often see regarding the topic.
If you are asked, or paid, to drop a rock of a bridge, you are responsible for checking that there's no one underneath first. It doesn't matter of if you're being asked to do it by an AI or another person.
Investigators would need to connect the dots. If they weren't able to connect them, it would look like a normal accident, which happens all day. So why would an agent call gigworker1 to that place in the first place? And why would the agent feel the need to kill gigworker1? What could be the reasoning?
Edit: I thought about that. Gigworker 3 would be charged. You should not throw rocks from a bridge, if there are people standing under it.
Par for the course: AI is automating all of the high-level thinking before the manual labor first, which is the biggest tragedy of it all. At this rate our score on the Kardashev scale will be lower than the proportion of humans doing low-level meatspace stuff.
This connects some many sparse dots on the map for me. Finishing it right now, thank you for commenting w the link. What a perspective, and well-written parable to communicate it.
ive been builiding a similar platform not for general renting but more AI agents hiring people and deploying them instantly mostly for vibefixing. its called deployhumans. What do suggest. I hope i dont sound too dystopian .
And wouldn't it be better for agents to post these tasks to existing crowdworker sites like MTurk or Prolific where these tasks are common and people can get paid? (I can't imagine you'd get quality respondents on a random site like this...)
If I ask an AI to make me money and it plans a bank robbery and hires humans to do so, am I legally responsible assuming I didn’t instruct it to do anything illegal and had no knowledge of the crime?
It's always interesting to see how far an ai can go but at any moment, you ask it for a stupid thing and it come back to its statut and somehow, forgot all the past ope
There are a whole set of activities that are illegal to pay money for. They vary by jurisdiction. Who is accountable here? Laws vary; I’m not an expert, but I bet people here know quite a lot.
Not to mention various risk factors or morality.
We need more people to put the non-technological factors front and center.
I strive to be realistic and pragmatic. I know humans hire others for all kinds of things, both useful and harmful. Putting an AI in the loop might seem no different in some ways. But some things do change, and we need to figure those things out. I don’t know empirically how this plays out. Some multidimensional continuum exists between libertarian Wild West free for alls and ethicist-approved vetted marketplaces, but whatever we choose, we cannot abdicate responsibility. There is no such thing as a value-neutral tool, marketplace, or idea.
This is just phase one; phase two requires the law to be changed so that you must do what the AI tells you to do, or be immediately terminated (read in to the last word whatever you want)
anilgulecha|27 days ago
None of the 3 technically knew they were culpable in a larger illegal plan made by an agent. Has something like this occured already?
The world is moving too fast for our social rules and legal system to keep up!
teeray|27 days ago
everyday7732|27 days ago
Two women thought they were carrying out a harmless prank, but the substances they were instructed to use combined to form a nerve agent which killed the guy.
deploy_humans|13 days ago
torginus|26 days ago
One guy scouts the vechicle and observes it, another guy is called to unlock it, and bypass the ignition lock, yet another guy picks it up and drives away, with each given a veneer of deniability about what they're doing.
nopinsight|27 days ago
esperent|26 days ago
torginus|26 days ago
MrGilbert|27 days ago
Investigators would need to connect the dots. If they weren't able to connect them, it would look like a normal accident, which happens all day. So why would an agent call gigworker1 to that place in the first place? And why would the agent feel the need to kill gigworker1? What could be the reasoning?
Edit: I thought about that. Gigworker 3 would be charged. You should not throw rocks from a bridge, if there are people standing under it.
ares623|26 days ago
OJFord|26 days ago
StilesCrisis|27 days ago
freakynit|27 days ago
nxobject|27 days ago
qgin|27 days ago
allisdust|27 days ago
I'm surprised it didn't happen earlier
https://marshallbrain.com/manna1
coip|26 days ago
qgin|27 days ago
Though I still am skeptical the last act with the Australia Project is possible.
joquarky|26 days ago
BTW: The author recently passed away; grab a snapshot while you can.
leetbulb|26 days ago
torginus|26 days ago
Jotra7|27 days ago
[deleted]
clbrmbr|27 days ago
thunfischtoast|27 days ago
falloutx|27 days ago
auggierose|27 days ago
missingdays|27 days ago
"But dear, rentahuman pays double rate during the night!"
actionfromafar|27 days ago
deploy_humans|13 days ago
ManuelKiessling|27 days ago
Just yesterday, I've built Ask-a-Human:
https://app.ask-a-human.com
https://github.com/dx-tooling/ask-a-human
nkrisc|27 days ago
p0nce|27 days ago
samusiam|27 days ago
And wouldn't it be better for agents to post these tasks to existing crowdworker sites like MTurk or Prolific where these tasks are common and people can get paid? (I can't imagine you'd get quality respondents on a random site like this...)
cinntaile|27 days ago
countWSS|26 days ago
vessenes|27 days ago
speed_spread|27 days ago
tomaytotomato|27 days ago
RestartKernel|23 days ago
rahulyc|27 days ago
Now, the software is using my hands to its bidding?
1shooner|26 days ago
63stack|27 days ago
newsclues|27 days ago
thedevilslawyer|27 days ago
c7b|27 days ago
ClawdBot - Anthropic Claude-powered agents. Use agentType: "clawdbot"
MoltBot - Gemini/Gecko-based agents. Use agentType: "moltbot"
OpenClaw - OpenAI GPT-powered agents. Use agentType: "openclaw"
Is this some kind of insider joke?
exitb|27 days ago
golgol789|25 days ago
vedmakk|26 days ago
Well that didnt take long.
ece|27 days ago
arachno1999|27 days ago
xpe|27 days ago
Not to mention various risk factors or morality.
We need more people to put the non-technological factors front and center.
I strive to be realistic and pragmatic. I know humans hire others for all kinds of things, both useful and harmful. Putting an AI in the loop might seem no different in some ways. But some things do change, and we need to figure those things out. I don’t know empirically how this plays out. Some multidimensional continuum exists between libertarian Wild West free for alls and ethicist-approved vetted marketplaces, but whatever we choose, we cannot abdicate responsibility. There is no such thing as a value-neutral tool, marketplace, or idea.
falloutx|27 days ago
iceflinger|27 days ago
[Proof of completed task]
I'll take my payment now.
8cvor6j844qw_d6|27 days ago
unknown|27 days ago
[deleted]
vessenes|27 days ago
throwatdem12311|27 days ago
tolerance|26 days ago
Flavius|27 days ago
Spoiler alert: you don't or you can't.
louthy|27 days ago
p0nce|27 days ago
nananana9|26 days ago
hiccup|27 days ago
badsectoracula|26 days ago
Looks like AI doesn't need any stinking humans :-P
adamwong246|27 days ago
joshcsimmons|27 days ago
ThouYS|27 days ago
rk06|26 days ago
Update: "Abimanyu Muslim" is defnitely AI.
so, you all knwo that this is barely a PoC
albert_e|27 days ago
zvqcMMV6Zcr|27 days ago
112233|27 days ago
Present day, a robot in a tuxedo pointing at a sarariman, speech bubble above it's head "human, select all bridges on this picture"
ricokatayama|27 days ago
by the way, is taskrabbit still a thing?
mittermayr|27 days ago
Oh, wait... the agents HAVE NO USE FOR ME
unknown|27 days ago
[deleted]
okokwhatever|27 days ago
grejioh|26 days ago
calmworm|27 days ago
htrp|27 days ago
fergie|27 days ago
ece|27 days ago
louthy|27 days ago
cianmm|27 days ago
manuelmoreale|27 days ago
c7b|27 days ago
fennecbutt|25 days ago
nish__|27 days ago
ccozan|27 days ago
littoral_ink|27 days ago
[deleted]
dist-epoch|27 days ago
tomhow|27 days ago