top | item 46868754 (no title) fastThinking | 27 days ago This reads less like nutrition science and more like addiction engineering. The tobacco analogy isn’t rhetorical, it’s structural. discuss order hn newest Citizen_Lame|27 days ago Why have people adopted ChatGPt lingo. fastThinking|26 days ago No LLM here, just a habit from academic writing. The reason the tobacco analogy works for me is that both cases optimize around reinforcement, not outcomes. bruce343434|27 days ago Because lots of people use it a lot, they subconsciously pick up on the language that surrounds them I.e. ai language grahamnorton39|27 days ago Actually, sounds like it’s written entirely by an LLM, and so do their other comments load replies (1)
Citizen_Lame|27 days ago Why have people adopted ChatGPt lingo. fastThinking|26 days ago No LLM here, just a habit from academic writing. The reason the tobacco analogy works for me is that both cases optimize around reinforcement, not outcomes. bruce343434|27 days ago Because lots of people use it a lot, they subconsciously pick up on the language that surrounds them I.e. ai language grahamnorton39|27 days ago Actually, sounds like it’s written entirely by an LLM, and so do their other comments load replies (1)
fastThinking|26 days ago No LLM here, just a habit from academic writing. The reason the tobacco analogy works for me is that both cases optimize around reinforcement, not outcomes.
bruce343434|27 days ago Because lots of people use it a lot, they subconsciously pick up on the language that surrounds them I.e. ai language
grahamnorton39|27 days ago Actually, sounds like it’s written entirely by an LLM, and so do their other comments load replies (1)
Citizen_Lame|27 days ago
fastThinking|26 days ago
bruce343434|27 days ago
grahamnorton39|27 days ago