[fmbb]

> - in any current law.

It has been since at least 2012 here in Sweden. That case went to our highest court and they decided a manga drawing was CSAM (maybe you are hung up on this term though, it is obviously not the same in Swedish).

The holder was not convicted but that is besides the point about the material.

[chrisjj]

> It has been since at least 2012 here in Sweden. That case went to our highest court

This one?

"Swedish Supreme Court Exonerates Manga Translator Of Porn Charges"

https://bleedingcool.com/comics/swedish-supreme-court-exoner...

It has zero bearing on the "Putting a bikini on a photo of a child ... is not abuse of a child" you're challenging.

> and they decided a manga drawing was CSAM

No they did not. They decided "may be considered pornographic". A far lesser offence than CSAM.

[direwolf20]

You are both arguing semantics. A pornographic image of a child. That's illegal no matter what it's called. I say killing, you say murder, same law though, still illegal.