top | item 46872611

(no title)

hk__2 | 26 days ago

Their GitHub issues are wild; random people are posting the same useless "bug reports" over and over multiple times per minute.

https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues

discuss

order

phito|26 days ago

Gives you a good window into a vibe coder's mentality. They do not care about anything except what they want to get done. If something is in the way, they will just try to brute force it until it works, not giving a duck if they are being an inconvenience to others. They're not aware of existing guidelines/conventions/social norms and they couldn't care less.

stevenpetryk|26 days ago

This sounds like a case of a bias called availability heuristic. It'd be worth remembering that you often don't notice people who are polite and normal nearly as much as people who are rude and obnoxious.

Forgeties79|26 days ago

I am starting to get concerned about how much “move fast break things” has basically become the average person’s mantra in the US. Or at least it feels that way.

egeozcan|26 days ago

Could it be that you're creating a stereotype in your head and getting angry about it?

People say these things against any group they dislike. It's so much that these days it feels like most of the social groups are defined by outsiders with the things they dislike about them.

qbxk|26 days ago

if history doesn't repeat, but it rhymes

does vibe coding rhyme with eternal september?

falloutx|26 days ago

IF anything, this is good news for Anthropic, they can now bury every open source project with useless isssues and PRs

soulofmischief|26 days ago

Are these superpredator vibe coders in the room with us right now?

monsieurbanana|26 days ago

Wow are these submitted automatically by claude code? I'm not comfortable with the level of details they have (user's anthropic email, full path of the project they were working on, stack traces...)

tobyjsullivan|26 days ago

Scanning a few. Some are definitely written by AI but most seem genuinely human (or at least, not claude).

Anecdata: I read five and only found one was AI. Your sampling may vary.

prodigycorp|26 days ago

I consider revealing my file structure and file paths to be PII so naturally seeing people's comfort with putting all that up there makes me queasy.

philipwhiuk|26 days ago

No, but they are submitted by the sort of people who will use AI to write the GitHub issue details

xnorswap|26 days ago

I think claude code has a /bug command which auto-fills those details in a github report.

embedding-shape|26 days ago

Definitively some automation involved, no way the typical user of Claude Code (no offense) would by default put so much details into reporting an issue, especially users who don't seem to understand it's Anthropic's backend that is the issue (given the status code) rather than the client/harness.

lavezzi|25 days ago

Nope, all user submitted likely with the assistance of Claude.

petters|26 days ago

How could they be? Claude was down

jscheel|26 days ago

and every single one of them checked "I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet"

david422|26 days ago

A long time ago I was taking flight lessons and I was going through the takeoff checklist. I was going through each item, but my instructor had to remind me that I am not just reading the checklist - I need understand/verify each checklist item before moving on. Always stuck with me.

kogasa240p|26 days ago

Some of them don't even have error messages.

kogasa240p|26 days ago

Goes to show that nobody reads error messages and it reminds me of this old blogpost:

> A kid knocks on my office door, complaining that he can't login. 'Have you forgotten your password?' I ask, but he insists he hasn't. 'What was the error message?' I ask, and he shrugs his shoulders. I follow him to the IT suite. I watch him type in his user-name and password. A message box opens up, but the kid clicks OK so quickly that I don't have time to read the message. He repeats this process three times, as if the computer will suddenly change its mind and allow him access to the network. On his third attempt I manage to get a glimpse of the message. I reach behind his computer and plug in the Ethernet cable. He can't use a computer.

http://coding2learn.org/blog/2013/07/29/kids-cant-use-comput...

ebonnafoux|26 days ago

It's wild that people check the box

> I have searched existing issues and this hasn't been reported yet

when the first 50 issues are about 500 error.

atonse|26 days ago

This is the kind of abuse that will cause them to just close GitHub issues.

Or they'll have to put something in the system prompt to handle this special case where it first checks for existing bugs and just upvotes it, rather than creating a new one.

orphea|26 days ago

I'm not too empathic to Anthropic. They did it to themselves by hyping AI and attracting that kind of people.

And it's not like they have been taking care of issues anyway.

echelon|26 days ago

The automation of the SWE.

ddmma|26 days ago

should enable some kind of agent automation

nerdjon|26 days ago

There has to be some sort of automation making these issues, to many of them are identical but posted by different people.

Also love how many have the “I searched for issues” checked which is clearly a lie.

Does Claude code make issue reports automatically? (And then how exactly would it be doing that if Anthropic was down when the use of LLM in the report is obvious )

LetsGetTechnicl|26 days ago

That's what happens when people outsource their mental capacity to a machine

cing|26 days ago

Github issues will be the real social network for AI agents, no humans allowed!

hacker_homie|26 days ago

Couldn't have happened to a better Repo, I needed that chuckle.

falloutx|26 days ago

Thats exactly what they Anthropic deserves (btw they cant even get Anthropic on github lmao, this must be the biggest company having to run with wrong ID on github)