[monsieurbanana]

Wow are these submitted automatically by claude code? I'm not comfortable with the level of details they have (user's anthropic email, full path of the project they were working on, stack traces...)

[tobyjsullivan]

Scanning a few. Some are definitely written by AI but most seem genuinely human (or at least, not claude).

Anecdata: I read five and only found one was AI. Your sampling may vary.

[prodigycorp]

I consider revealing my file structure and file paths to be PII so naturally seeing people's comfort with putting all that up there makes me queasy.

[philipwhiuk]

No, but they are submitted by the sort of people who will use AI to write the GitHub issue details

[xnorswap]

I think claude code has a /bug command which auto-fills those details in a github report.

[embedding-shape]

Definitively some automation involved, no way the typical user of Claude Code (no offense) would by default put so much details into reporting an issue, especially users who don't seem to understand it's Anthropic's backend that is the issue (given the status code) rather than the client/harness.

[lavezzi]

Nope, all user submitted likely with the assistance of Claude.

[petters]

How could they be? Claude was down