top | item 46875664 (no title) squibonpig | 26 days ago Yeah I kinda agree. I also think maybe like, having kids kinda blows. Maybe people just weren't able to choose before? discuss order hn newest palmotea|26 days ago > Yeah I kinda agree. I also think maybe like, having kids kinda blows. Maybe people just weren't able to choose before?Having kids is a lot of work, but it's great. It's definitely not self-centered hedonistic pleasure, though.If you're all like, "what's in it for me" having kids is probably not for you. echelon|26 days ago What else was there to do?Before 2000, TV was only "on" for three hours a day. You'd run out of things to read in the newspaper.Before 1940, there was literally nothing else to do.
palmotea|26 days ago > Yeah I kinda agree. I also think maybe like, having kids kinda blows. Maybe people just weren't able to choose before?Having kids is a lot of work, but it's great. It's definitely not self-centered hedonistic pleasure, though.If you're all like, "what's in it for me" having kids is probably not for you.
echelon|26 days ago What else was there to do?Before 2000, TV was only "on" for three hours a day. You'd run out of things to read in the newspaper.Before 1940, there was literally nothing else to do.
palmotea|26 days ago
Having kids is a lot of work, but it's great. It's definitely not self-centered hedonistic pleasure, though.
If you're all like, "what's in it for me" having kids is probably not for you.
echelon|26 days ago
Before 2000, TV was only "on" for three hours a day. You'd run out of things to read in the newspaper.
Before 1940, there was literally nothing else to do.