My main concern is, how long is it before you can't print a replacement part for something you bought because it looks too similar to an OEM part and the manufacturer doesn't think you should be able to do that so they throw a little money to the right politician.
laylower|25 days ago
Cory talked about this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39jsstmmUUs
teo_zero|26 days ago
At least 25 years. That's the time passed since the first introduction of Eurion marks on banknotes. As far as I know, noone has used it to block reproduction of anything other than money.
jrockway|25 days ago
AlOwain|25 days ago
JasonADrury|25 days ago
Arch-TK|26 days ago
On the other hand, if I need a replacement part for something, it's unlikely I will find the manufacturer giving me models for it. And if a manufacturer is giving me models for it, they probably do so with the explicit expectation that I might end up using them to manufacture a replacement.
In most cases either me or some other volunteer will need to measure the existing part, write down all the critical measurements, and then design a new part from scratch in CAD.
Even if somehow you are able to fingerprint on those critical measurements, that's just _one_ part.
The only way this kind of nonsense law could work is if you mandate that 3D printers must not accept commands from an untrusted source (signature verification) and then you must have software which uses a database to check for such critical measurements, ideally _before_ slicing.
Except that still doesn't work because I can always post-process a part to fit.
And it doesn't work even more because the software will need to contain a signing key. Unless the signing key is on a remote server somewhere to which you must send your model for validation.
This is never going to work, or scale.
There are even more hurdles... I can design and build a 3D printer from scratch and manufacture it using non-CNC machined parts at home. A working, high quality 3D printer.
Where are you going to force me to put the locks? Are you going to require me to show my ID when buying stepper motors and stepper motor drivers?
What about other kinds of manufacturing (that these laws, at least the Washington State ones, also cover)?
Will you ban old hardware?
What about a milling machine? Are you going to ban non-CNC mills?
These are the most ignorant laws made by the most ignorant people. The easiest way to ban people from manufacturing their own guns is to ban manufacture of your own guns. But again, this is a complete non-issue in the US where you can probably get a gun illegally more easily than you can 3D print something half as reliable.
ale42|26 days ago
rustyhancock|26 days ago
tobyjsullivan|26 days ago
There’s valid concern with these types of laws and scope creep. But there’s also precedent which shows they can work and be applied reasonably.
PunchyHamster|25 days ago
Go ahead, try that
PlatoIsADisease|26 days ago
I was assured by the internet, I was paranoid, blah blah safety...
Then a few weeks ago something about Minnesota and ICE making drones illegal to fly or something...
The weird part is that, in that 15 years, I've become more moderate and pro-democratic rule of law... but I was right about my previous concerns. Not that I believe in the Justice behind them anymore.
salawat|26 days ago
My Plato hating friend, my "called it" list is filled with things the old-timers at the time said no one would be stupid enough to, and the old codgers went and died on me so I can't even give em a good lambast. I believed them, and helped them build things... Now I get to watch things get coopted by a madman and a NatSec apparatus. Pour one out.
TOMDM|26 days ago
EDIT: To be clear, my belief is that a plurality of the voting population voted for this, that much is obvious.
My belief is also that despite the fact that the current administration was elected, there are democratic norms and rules for what outcomes require that a bill must be passed to enact, that states can decide how they can govern themselves within well defined bounds.
All of this is being ignored despite the structures defined in the American democatric system, not because of it.
rpcope1|26 days ago
catgirlinspace|25 days ago
watwut|26 days ago
nemomarx|26 days ago
onetokeoverthe|26 days ago
[deleted]
2muchcoffeeman|26 days ago
dns_snek|26 days ago
vincnetas|26 days ago
hedora|25 days ago
I’m really liking my (better specs for less money) elegoo centauri. I compiled the slicer from source because there weren’t Linux binaries.
All problems solved. It even happily prints exotic stuff like TPU, which I guess bambu has been cracking down on for unclear reasons.
Maybe I don’t know what I’m missing, but I’ve had zero issues downloading files (even from bambu-centric websites) and running them through the slicer.
I can’t imagine wanting to use their cloud whatever thing, or it providing any value beyond the open source stacks.
hamdingers|25 days ago
You can still make an open source printer with some extrusion and stepper motors, same as always.
MegaDeKay|25 days ago
sharperguy|25 days ago
bluescrn|26 days ago
qmr|25 days ago
alnwlsn|25 days ago
ddtaylor|26 days ago
0xedd|26 days ago
Prusa is king. High quality. Open source. EU made and engineered. Slicer is a market leader (Bambu's a fork of it).
passwordoops|25 days ago
dmux|25 days ago
PunchyHamster|25 days ago
hedora|25 days ago
If they cared even a little bit about gun violence, they’d focus on mental health and other preventive measures.
If they just wanted to provide the illusion that they cared about gun violence, they’d go after high-volume manufacturers first.
This reminds me of Trump’s Venezuela coup. I’m offended they aren’t even bothering to properly lie about their motives.
nerdsniper|26 days ago
nish__|26 days ago
You see how it's impossible to regulate technology? I don't want my tax dollars funding impossible missions.
crote|25 days ago
b00ty4breakfast|26 days ago
DeathArrow|26 days ago