Same, I did try to sell native app development to my current project, but some higher up had already decided on React Native at the time.
And I get it, it feels like native app development is a more expensive specialism, and this particular use case is mostly the customer portal but in an app. But I retain the strong opinion that if you as a company are serious about app development, if you want a good app, you need native apps and native app developers.
Especially if you want to be present outside of the confines of your app - widgets, lock screen activities, smart watches, etc all require proper native components, because they come with very tight memory constraints and just loading in React Native and its JS stuff costs you 80% of available memory budget.
As someone who use Eclipse and transitioned to Android Studio over the course of my career, Android Studio is actually pretty great. These days I use Cursor almost exclusively for Flutter, but Android Studio is great for building native Android apps.
Having used Android Studio for work for a few years and used Xcode quite a lot for longer, I find the praise for Android Studio to be puzzling. I would give it "fine" but no way I'd say it is "good". I haven't used it enough compared to Xcode to say if one is better than the other.
I would recommend trying out kilocode as a vscodium extension instead of Cursor. Better pricing and more model options. For me it completely replaced Cursor and couldn't be happier.
From all the things to work on Xcode... fixing the ghost diagnostic errors, actual hot reload instead of the nightmare Previews are, tooling to help diagnose the now messy Swift 6 concurrency code, that thing where you can't open a project and one of it's dependent swift packages for editing simultaneously ...
The list of actually useful things that can be added/changed in Xcode has more tokens than Claude is allowed to read at one time before grepping.
> you can't open a project and one of it's dependent swift packages for editing simultaneously
You can. Any local packages are automatically editable in Xcode. Opening two projects referencing the same local package dependency isn't possible however.
Used XCode in anger from 2011-2016 to develop an iOS app with several million users and found it to be just as awful and temperamental as others here describe.
NL807|25 days ago
I wish people did more native app development.
Cthulhu_|25 days ago
And I get it, it feels like native app development is a more expensive specialism, and this particular use case is mostly the customer portal but in an app. But I retain the strong opinion that if you as a company are serious about app development, if you want a good app, you need native apps and native app developers.
Especially if you want to be present outside of the confines of your app - widgets, lock screen activities, smart watches, etc all require proper native components, because they come with very tight memory constraints and just loading in React Native and its JS stuff costs you 80% of available memory budget.
billynomates|25 days ago
bjustin|25 days ago
k4rli|25 days ago
svantana|25 days ago
isodev|25 days ago
The list of actually useful things that can be added/changed in Xcode has more tokens than Claude is allowed to read at one time before grepping.
willtemperley|25 days ago
You can. Any local packages are automatically editable in Xcode. Opening two projects referencing the same local package dependency isn't possible however.
timcobb|25 days ago
seba_dos1|25 days ago
rjzzleep|25 days ago
urbandw311er|25 days ago
marxisttemp|25 days ago