top | item 46889298

(no title)

regularization | 25 days ago

[flagged]

discuss

order

ghusto|25 days ago

Talk to some Iranians. We would _welcome_ "imperialist" intervention.

The black and white "west is bad" narrative you're being fed isn't accurate.

culi|25 days ago

Definitely seems the majority viewpoint of people from Tehrangeles

twister727|25 days ago

How can you welcome imperalist intervention when the imperialists are the ones purposely causing (to a large extent) the economic instability?

Just trying to understand.

judah|25 days ago

Iran's government is an Islamic fundamentalist dictatorship. It has imprisoned and killed protestors[0], it hung over 700 political dissidents last year[1], it has imprisoned and executed people who have left Islam[2], it has beaten and imprisoned women who refused to wear hijab[3]. As for LGBT rights, Equaldex lists Iran 190th out of 197 nations[4]. Time Magazine reports[5] that some 30,000 people were killed in January for protesting the government.

Even the parent article reports first-hand that the Iranian regime is now labelling protesters as terrorists and calls for their arrests.

This, combined with the drought and economic collapse, has pushed the Iranian people towards revolt.

This is not the fault of Israel, America, Trump, Greenland, white people, or any other boogeyman. It's a feature of Iranian government, and the Iranian people want change.

[0]: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jan/27/i...

[1]: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/07/iran-horrifyi...

[2]: https://persecution.exmuslims.org/countries/iran/

[3]: https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/10/14/iran-new-hijab-law-adds-...

[4]: https://www.equaldex.com/region/iran

[5]: https://time.com/7357635/more-than-30000-killed-in-iran-say-...

jmyeet|25 days ago

To dismiss the impact of economic sanctions is at best intellectually dishonest. Economic sanctions aren't a natural disaster. Somebody is imposing them. Who, exactly? And why?

Also, US allies (ie Israel) can kill hundreds of thousands of people without any consequences. In fact, we bankroll the weapons they use to do it to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars.

So why are the documented atrocities of one country not an issue at all but the transgressions of another country worthy of starving that country for decades? What's different between these two? And who is making that determination?

Hikikomori|25 days ago

Remind me why they are in power again.

squillion|25 days ago

The Iranian government is responsible of all sorts of human rights violations, and also for the drought (at least partly), but the economic collapse was triggered by the US.

Bessent said so at Davos:

"President Trump ordered our Treasury and our OFAC division (Office of Foreign Asset Control) to put maximum pressure on Iran. And it's worked, because in December, their economy collapsed. [...] So this is why people took to the street. This is economic statecraft". https://youtu.be/VQQXLnXlWqY?t=1722

Is this how America helps dissidents? Make them so miserable they can't bear it anymore? Anyways, it never works. It just makes civilians more miserable and the government more repressive. Look at Cuba or North Korea.

MyHonestOpinon|25 days ago

Make no mistake about Venezuela. The Maduro regime has caused untold pain and suffering to the Venezuelan people. Venezuela was no longer sovereign nation, Maduro was staying in power by force against the will of the people.

andrepd|25 days ago

I get anti-West sentiment. I get anti-US imperialism. I get pointing out the double standard of the West regarding Israel, their atrocities and genocide. I get looking with cynicism at the great powers' manouevers.

I don't get—never have, probably never will—painting the Islamic Republic of Iran as saviours, freedom fighters, or the last bulwark of an axis of resistance.

If the Boston strangler was anti-imperialist, would you claim he was a hero? It feels like you would.

twister727|25 days ago

Sure, Iran isn't exactly the best country, but they're still a sovereign nation right? Let them figure their own problems.

Just because they have a shitty government doesn't mean we (USA) have the right to their oil.

regularization|25 days ago

If the mullahs are so bad, why did the UK and US back them against the democracy of Mossadegh in the 1950s? Then Savak with CIA help slaughtered the secular left in Iran into the 1970s.

Westerners work to slaughter the secular left in a country, then use that as their entitlement to take over the country - "there is no secular force to take over".

This just happened in Syria - the West forced out a secular leader to replace him with a now celebrated al-Qaeda leader who the US had a $10 million bounty on fourteen months ago. Who is currently slaughtering every minority ethnicity in the country.

twister727|25 days ago

Why are so many Iranians (like the author of the article) repeating the Western propaganda though? That confuses me.

1over137|25 days ago

Iranians hate the dictatorship they live under. The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

ghusto|25 days ago

If that's sarcasm, it's British levels of dry.