top | item 46889602

(no title)

clucas | 25 days ago

300,000? Can you cite something for that?

Edit to add: Also, Israel was actually attacked, and civilians were raped, kidnapped, and murdered. Did any of the protestors in Iran kill, rape, or murder any of members of the regime who subsequently slaughtered them?

discuss

order

ekjhgkejhgk|25 days ago

> Edit to add: Also, Israel was actually attacked, and civilians were raped, kidnapped, and murdered. Did any of the protestors in Iran kill, rape, or murder any of members of the regime who subsequently slaughtered them?

Just to be clear. You're arguing that if a country is attacked, it's ok to kill civilians that are unrelated to the attack? Or are you arguing that those 300,000 were somehow involved in the killing of the 3,000 Israelis that died in the Hamas attack?

reliabilityguy|25 days ago

> You're arguing that if a country is attacked, it's ok to kill civilians that are unrelated to the attack?

If a country is attacked, and defends itself, are you saying it should stop any form of defense because a civilian can die?

If this is the logic, then what would prevent armies from using human shields?

clucas|25 days ago

> You're arguing that if a country is attacked, it's ok to kill civilians that are unrelated to the attack?

How on earth did you get that from my comment? Can you think of a more charitable way to interpret what I said?