top | item 46889634

(no title)

indoordin0saur | 25 days ago

Blue Origin at least runs its rockets on hydrogen whose exhaust is only water.

discuss

order

fuzzfactor|25 days ago

Where do they get the hydrogen without putting a load of CO2 into the atmosphere just to manufacture the hydrogen to begin with?

One thing to think about is debt which is not in terms of money.

People are becoming more familiar with "technical debt" since otherwise it comes due by surprise.

With hamsterwheels in space you've got energy debt.

Separate from all other forms of debt that are involved.

Like financial debt, which is only a problem if you can't really afford to do the project so you have to beg, borrow, and/or steal to get it going.

On that point I think I'd be a little skeptical if the richest known person can't actually afford this easily. Especially if he really wants it with all his heart, and has put in any worthwhile effort so far.

Anyway, solar cells are kind of weak when you think about it, they don't produce the high output of a suitable chemical reaction, like the kind that launches the rockets themselves. Which releases so much energy so fast that it's always going to take a serious amount of time for the "little" solar cells to have finally produced an equal amount of energy before a net positive can begin to accrue.

Keeping the assets safely on the home planet simply provides a jump-start that can not be matched.

All other things being unequal or not.

zbentley|25 days ago

And heat and pressure. Negligible amounts in terms of the biosphere, but not in terms of flora and fauna in proximity to launch sites.

sgt|24 days ago

Flora and fauna near launch sites is not a battle you are going to win. The next space race will need more launch sites, not fewer and we're gonna have to accept a negative impact around those sites.