[aeneas_ory]

It‘s really hard to read this article, it smells of LLM generated slop once you get past the first couple of paragraphs - lots of negative parallelisms and lots of words without adding value to the sentence:

> To validate the thesis that the Yen unwind is the primary driver of volatility, we must examine the sequence of events. The crash did not happen in a vacuum; it followed a precise timeline …

> It wasn't just about rates anymore; it was about the stability of the U.S.-led global order

> The unwinding of a carry trade is not a monolithic event; it is a cascade that ripples outward

It‘s like almost in every paragraph. I don’t understand why this gets to be on the frontpage to be honest. It just reads horrible even if some of the points may be true (or hallucinated, who knows)

[potsandpans]

I have a sense that were in a moment of mass hysteria.

You dot even understand what your reading anymore. Cant tell whether you're reading a hallucination or someones thoughts.

"I don't agree / understand this, it must not be real!"

Now, you have to wonder: is my grammar just poor? Or did I intentionally inject spelling and grammar errors into the output or an llm? Is it in my system prompt to do this?