(no title)
ISL | 24 days ago
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-119publ38/pdf/PLAW-... : the Attorney General was to have produced the entirety of the Epstein files, with very narrowly-enumerated redactions, in December. She has not done so.
Furthermore, there are numerous allegations that the documents that have been released contain CSAM, which (referencing the PDF above) may fall afoul of 18 U.S.C. 2252–2252A.
In addition, one need only glance at the action in US courts to see egregious violations of the Constitution and valid court orders playing out daily.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26513988-trorder0128...
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mnd.230...
unknown|23 days ago
[deleted]
typeofhuman|23 days ago
jcranmer|23 days ago
(It's also worth noting that almost none of the government's appeals to their losses in preliminary injunctions have been on the merits as to whether or not their actions were legal, but rather on the grounds of "no one should be allowed to challenge our actions," which has also been a fairly losing argument for everybody except SCOTUS.)
bryceacc|23 days ago
yes.... any administration can be found guilty of violating law, and should be dealt with accordingly.
paulryanrogers|23 days ago
Obviously administrations can violate the law. Otherwise this is just an autocracy with term limits.
542354234235|23 days ago
Allegations are literally evidence. "He attacked me" is an allegation of a crime and is evidence that would be used in conjunction with other evidence to prosecute said crime.
rockskon|23 days ago
anon84873628|23 days ago